In addition, it receives a large number of questionable assumptions, speculations and distortions. United Health can provide more clarity in the matter. So still trust in family courts and their reviewers who have quickly disabused, because arranged Inobhutnahmen as well as in handling procedures some judges from the reviewers want to no objective examination of the case and a neutral based recommendation, but want the confirmation decision, he simply they long have themselves taken. The latter prove undoubtedly numerous evidence decisions “which indicate that the concerned judges from the outset boils want to withdraw the entire custody. So, we can assume that handling procedures often are nothing more than show trials, which are needlessly expensive and considered at length through the use of experts. Also have the quotes, that family matters under Often not to undeniable trains of theatre of the absurd wear lead of German family judges.
The family judge of the family A. Merten decided completely, the undoubtedly poor opinion of the specialist Dr. med. L. from Cologne without objections to acknowledge and to escape the mother custody of her daughter and the partial custody of her son. Other judicial requirements forced the mother of the child during the process instances to delivery a with her daughter Mila in a mental hospital in Hagen, where doctors found a loving contact between mother and daughter and claimed any mental disorders. The current treating medical specialist for Psychiatry in Ennepetal, acknowledged that the Court had no personality disorders and applied for a new neutral review for the mother to present facts but repeatedly adapted and be refashioned should by now very disgruntled social staff. Was also the mother of the child by the family court for a few months in a Mother child home in Ennepetal, spent. When she expressed the desire there for Christmas for a day to go home to want to she arrest 4 weeks from the home line and was allowed only to the door with their children, told the mother.